Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 21:47:30 07/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 1999 at 18:33:40, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On July 06, 1999 at 18:22:07, John Wentworth wrote: > >>It would be interesting to know if programs that have been "learning" over the >>past few years, if they could compete with programs that have not "learned" >>anything yet. For example, MChess 5.0 which came out several years ago was >>supposedly able to learn, if someone has been continually using it and it has >>been learning, could it compete with a program like Hiarcs 7.32 or Fritz 5.x ? > >Hello! > >No! > >But it don´t loose the same game twice. This is the case with programs with no >learning, especially Rebel that often play the same variation over and over >again. Rebel has some primitive book-learning but it don´t work in narrow lines, >where there isn't any allowed alternatives. Mchess have a good learner but it's >not easy to save a game from a rotten opening-line, which is the problem in many >cases. That is because it is proven you have tested Rebel WITHOUT the learner. There is nothing wrong with Rebel's learner. There was something wrong with your testing. Ed Schroder >Regards Bertil SSDF
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.