Author: James T. Walker
Date: 05:58:09 07/07/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 1999 at 16:04:46, James T. Walker wrote: >On July 06, 1999 at 15:10:03, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On July 06, 1999 at 14:56:07, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>On July 06, 1999 at 14:18:31, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>On July 06, 1999 at 00:47:17, Brett Clark wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 05, 1999 at 21:13:47, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> ><snip> ><snip> >> >>I think that you gave Fritz too much hash tables. >>I think you should follow Fritz's formula for hash tables and give Fritz less >>hash tables in blitz. >> >>I know that I can beat chessmaster6000 in 1 minute per game if I give it big >>hash tables because chessmaster is losing on time. >>I guess Fritz did not lose on time but even if you assume that Fritz is only >>slower by 1 second per move then it may effect the result in blitz games. >> >>Uri > >Hello Uri, >I have not noticed Fritz suffering from too much hash tables. I know that Bob >Hyatt say it's ok to give crafty lots of hash tables. But to be sure I will run >another 100 games tonight with Fritz limited to 16 Meg hash tables and keep >Hiarcs at 64 Meg. It does not seem to hurt Hiarcs to have 64 Meg at Blitz. >Jim Walker Hello again, I ran another 100 games last night with Fritz hash tables set to 16 Meg. I kept Hiarcs at 64 Meg for consistency. The score did drop off but will probably have to run a couple hundred more to find out if it's due to hash memory or just normal variation. The latest score has Hiarcs winning by 58.5 to 41.5. This still leaves Hiarcs in charge. It's possible also that 64 Meg is too much memory for Hiarcs at Blitz but it's certainly much better than 4 Meg. I never thought I would see Fritz get beat at blitz like this. :-) Jim Walker
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.