Author: Harald Faber
Date: 05:13:13 07/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 08, 1999 at 08:00:24, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On July 07, 1999 at 10:13:23, Harald Faber wrote: > >>Because all others benefit only 50% I wouldn't call it a cache issue. > >it is definetely a cache issue ! >the k6-2 has a bigger cache. >all other programs have small engines. cstal has a BIG engine. >cstal win95 runs 2 times faster on an amdk6-3 than on an amdk6-2 >with the same speed. because of caching. of course - if cstal >engine would be SMALLER, it would react like all other programs. >but it isn't small. Are MCP, The King and Hiarcs that much smaller that they behave "normal" while CSTal seems to be optimized for AMD? Sorry, I can't believe it. Give me some dates of the cache sizes of MMX166, AMD-K6-200.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.