Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:32:40 07/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 08, 1999 at 08:13:13, Harald Faber wrote: >Are MCP, The King and Hiarcs that much smaller that they behave "normal" while >CSTal seems to be optimized for AMD? CTal is NOT optimized for AMD. Chris has IMO NO (NADA) / NONE AMD -CPU in his company, when i remember it right he still uses pentium2/300 he bought for paris championship. >Sorry, I can't believe it. Give me some dates of the cache sizes of MMX166, >AMD-K6-200. amdk6-2 has twice the cache of the intel pentium 1 cpu. although pentium1 mmx has twice the cache the pentium 1 without mmx has. Still k6-2 has bigger cache ! therefore k6-2 is faster than pentium1 mmx. and pentium2 has only 32KB internal + 512 external (half speed). but k6-3 has 256 INTERNAL ! + 1MB pipeline-burst as external !! the engine size and evaluation part of cstal is bigger than that of mchess and that of the king. i know you don't like this, but its true. benchmarks show this.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.