Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 13:52:12 07/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 08, 1999 at 15:06:50, KarinsDad wrote: >If you cannot afford the big Intel chips, then the K6-3 is probably a better buy >than a PII. Even if you cannot get your code size under 298K (I am not sure how >much of the L1 cache is dedicated to code on the AMD, probably 32K), the extra >200-225 Mhz on the L2 cache puts the AMD slightly faster than the same speed PII >or PIII for chess programs (but the 500 PIII seems to outperform the 450 K6-3 >even with the faster L2 cache in almost all of the tests that I have seen, but >you have to pay to get the slight performance improvement). > >KarinsDad :) try p3/500 with cstal win95 and tell me about the results. THEN we can discuss. cstal is huge. lots of code to differenciate which moves to choose.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.