Author: Harald Faber
Date: 05:53:50 07/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 1999 at 08:27:50, Guido Schimmels wrote: >On July 09, 1999 at 03:33:17, Harald Faber wrote: > >>I also grinned about that as the history goes >>1.0->2.0->2.1->3.0->3.5->98->99->2000->7.32 >>So it only makes sense if 98=4.32, 99=5.32 and 2000=6.32... > >Maybe they eventually figured the risk of being mistaken >for a Microsoft product is not good marketing :) >Or it has something to do with the Y2K-bug. > >-- >Guido However, a new version this year can't be named 2000 as that already exists. For 2001 it is much too early, so what to do? 2000.5? :-)))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.