Author: Pete Galati
Date: 22:15:51 07/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 1999 at 04:53:17, Tania Devora wrote: > >Hi guys, I want to realize a wonderful tournament between two computers PII 350 >Mhz, with the some chessbase engines and winboard engines, the time will be : 30 >minutes per game. > >Chessbase engines : Hiarcs7.32, Fritz5.32, Nimzo99, Junior5, THE FOUR BIG, > Fritz5.16, Fritz4, Fritz3, Fritz1.2 Hiarcs6, Junior4.6. > >Chessbase team : 10 engines. > >Winboard engines : Arasan5.1, Crafty16-6, Lggold 2, Bionic Impakt, > CometB00, The Crazy bishop, Gromit2, Exchess250. > Gnuchess. > >Winboard team : 9 engines. > > > >My question is : What is the better engine for winboard ? I want to put it in my >tournament. Please tell me. > > >Thanks guys! > >Greetings! Tania,D Speaking only on the Winboard side of things here: AnMon mentioned by Sheyla elseware in this thread is a great new engine. Another very strong engine that I wanted to mention is Phalanx, it's somewhere in the ballpark with Crafty and Comet. With the parameters setup well on the latest Phalanx, only Crafty and Comet should be stronger, the rest, even Bionik Impact I beleive would follow Phalanx. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.