Author: Len Eisner
Date: 11:32:31 07/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 11, 1999 at 11:12:22, John R. Menke, Sr. wrote: >On July 10, 1999 at 13:26:48, Len Eisner wrote: > >>Is there any advantage in using separate interfaces for Fritz 5.32, Junior 5.32, >>and Hiarcs 7.32? >> >>I have all of the programs installed on my hard disk, each with its own GUI. My >>preference would be to use the Fritz 5.32 interface for all of the engines since >>it seems to have the most features. Do I give up anything by doing this >>(besides the hmark and jmark tests)? >> >>Len > > >I didn't know that Hiarcs and Fritz had different interfaces! That's news to >me!? My recently-purchased Hiarcs 7.32 CD came with a Fritz interface and a >Fritz manual (on the CD), but no Hiarcs interface and no Hiarcs manual. There >was no further explanation, so I just naturally assumed that the interface and >manual provided applied to Hiarcs as well as Fritz, and that there was no >separate Hiarcs interface or manual. But now your posting makes me wonder... > >--JRM I'm not sure of all the differences myself. That's why I asked. Here's what I know to be different among the three programs: (1) each program GUI has a benchmark test that only works for that program, and (2) Hiarcs 7.32 does not seem to have the variation board feature that Fritz and Junior (patched version) have. Len
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.