Author: blass uri
Date: 08:46:23 07/12/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 1999 at 11:01:18, Terry Presgrove wrote: >On July 12, 1999 at 04:01:34, Will Singleton wrote: > >>On July 12, 1999 at 00:02:42, KarinsDad wrote: >> >>>On July 11, 1999 at 18:56:30, Andrew Williams wrote: >>> >>>>On July 11, 1999 at 13:54:47, Terry Presgrove wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nicely done! I particularly like your use of metaphors. I find it hard to >>>>> see how anyone can expect those who post here to avoid references to chess >>>>> events and chess in general. How can you seperate chess from computer chess? >>>>> TP >>>> >>>>I don't understand your last comment. Why do we need people announcing >>>>general chess events here? Surely that is done much better at a site >>>>like TWIC? I honestly think that this stuff is out of place here. This >>>>is an excellent forum for computer chess. It will become useless if we >>>>all start to discuss whether player A is better than player B or how well >>>>player C is going to do in a tournament. There are many other places for >>>>this sort of thing on the Internet, but there are hardly any other (civilized) >>>>places for computer chess. I personally wish people would restrict themselves >>>>to the topic for which this forum was originally formed. This place not called >>>>the Computer-Chess Club for nothing! >>>> >>>>Regards >>>> >>>>Andrew Williams >>> >>>That's ok with me. As long as people stop discussing the various merits of >>>processors and motherboards and other computer components as well. You cannot >>>drop out the chess half of computer chess without also dropping out the computer >>>half of computer chess. >>> >>>Let me know when you find THE TOPIC for which this forum was originally formed. >>>:) >>> >>>KarinsDad :) >> >>I would think the computer component is key. That is, the merits of various >>cpu's and other computer related items are more relevant to computer-chess than >>what Karpov and Kasparov are doing. Correct? Human tourneys and discussions of >>same have zero to do with our topic, while computers have everything to do with >>it. >> >>Will > > I think this perspective puts CCC platform into a very small box indeed. > It makes this club solely a technical discussion on bit boards, null moves, > cpu's and whether or not Chessmaster or Hiarcs is #1. This is not so narrow. There are more subjects that you can discuss here about computer-chess. For example:analyzing games of computers. posting games of computers against humans and against computers. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.