Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:34:03 07/13/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 1999 at 07:40:23, Shep wrote: >On July 13, 1999 at 07:20:19, Terry Ripple wrote: > >>On July 13, 1999 at 06:56:32, Shep wrote: >> >>>On July 13, 1999 at 06:29:35, Terje Vagle wrote: >>> >>>>PII-450 >>>>128MB RAM >>>>100 MB HAshtable >>>> >>>>Nodes pr. sec: Ca 155000-160000 >>>> >>>>Any comments on this? >>> >>>Perfectly reasonable. >>>I get 165,000-200,000 on the PIII-550, same hash size. >>> >>>The speed-up from the P6-233 is typically less than 3x (Crafty gets exactly 3x, >>>like most other CPU/memory benchmarks), sometimes even less than 2,5x. AMD chips >>>are better for Rebel, I believe even the K6-3-450 would beat my numbers. >>> >>>--- >>>Shep >>-------- >>Hi again,Shep! >> Are the AMD Chips also better for the Hiarcs7.32 or is the Pentium better? >>Thanyou in advance for any information, > >Don't know. People would have to post some HiarcsMark results. >But I suppose the Pentiums do better on all the 32bit Fritz engines. >Rebel and CSTal II are the best examples for AMD-loving programs. > >--- >Shep Rebel 10c, 60MB hash, system tiger off 1.a4 d5 2. a5 gets NPS: AMDk6-3/400: 160-214.000 NPS 10.ply +0.36 after 41 seconds 11.ply +0.34 after 2min 5 seconds 11.03 ply +0.35 after 2min 38 seconds AMDk6-2/400: 130-160.000 NPS 10.ply +0.36 after 51 seconds 11.ply +0.34 after 2min 35 seconds 11.03 ply +0.35 after 3min 16 seconds this gives approx. 1.2 times faster between k6-3/k6-2. for CSTal WIN (32 BIT !!) the factor is 2 times !!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.