Author: KarinsDad
Date: 13:05:23 07/13/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 1999 at 15:31:08, blass uri wrote: > >On July 13, 1999 at 14:53:58, KarinsDad wrote: > ><snipped> >>Uri, >> >>Well, I am still having problems understanding your concept of good vs. bad >>pawns, but I guess that it is just a different paradigm. > >you can call it in a different name if you want. >The definition is clear. > >I decided to use the name good pawns because bad pawns are not passed pawns and >have no chance to promote before they become passed pawns. > >I know that good pawns are also sometimes not passed pawns but at least they >have sometimes chance to promote. > >I thought that is logical to think that you get promotion only if your behavior >is good so it seems reasonable for me to define good pawns as promoted >pawns,some pawns that made the step to become a passed pawns to help them to >promote. > >I defined also good pawns as 2 or more pawns in the same file even if they are >not passed pawns. >I know that they are not close to promotion but I see nothing wrong with it >because I thought only that you must be good to get promotion and I did not say >that it is enough. > > Thanks, now I understand what you mean. KarinsDad :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.