Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 04:19:26 07/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 1999 at 06:41:42, Steffen Jakob wrote: >Hi Frank! > >On July 14, 1999 at 06:20:07, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>Hello Will, >> >>statistic for longer games. >> >> 18 x 100 : 3404 = 0.53% (over 200 moves) >> 70 x 100 : 3404 = 2.06% (over 150 moves) >>386 x 100 : 3404 = 11.34% (over 100 moves) oh 11,34% !!! >> >>(3404 games, 40 moves in 40 minutes, WinBoard 4.0.0 and 4.0.2, 32 MB >>Hash-Tables, Ponder = Off, AMD K6-2 333-416 MHz, AMD K6-3 450 MHz, Celeron 450 >>MHz and Pentium III 504 MHz). >> >>So longest games ... >> >>Bringer - Stobor 253 moves OK, Nr. 1 :-))) >>Bionic - Patzer 245 moves >>Phalanx - Patzer 242 moves > >It would be interesting to see the same statistics only for games which didn't >end with a draw. > >Greetings, >Steffen. Hello Steffen, OK, the new WB database = 3172 games (I delate old games with ZChess 0.92-1.0 and Gromit 2.0-2.1, 350 games) In this database I have 729 remis games = 22,98 %. 0 - 25 moves = 17 games 2,33 % 26 - 50 moves = 101 games 13,85 % 51 - 75 moves = 223 games 30,59 % 76 - 100 moves = 160 games 21,94 % 101 - 125 moves = 112 games 15,36 % 126 - 150 moves = 61 games 8,37 % 151 - ... moves = 55 games 7,54 % In 729 games = ~ 83 moves ! I think that the table-bases very importent for the programs, when I see my little statistic. And ... Phalanx, AnMon and Comet have a very good statistic in win under 30 moves. Over 400 games with Comet and Phalanx and over 250 games with AnMon ! Kind regards Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.