Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Elizabeth Pähtz cites Hiarcs 7.32 in support of 10. ...Qe6

Author: Francis Monkman

Date: 14:01:12 07/15/99

Go up one level in this thread



On July 15, 1999 at 15:42:19, KarinsDad wrote:


>I think the problem is one of short sighted goals vs. long term goals. Hirarcs
>is probably only looking 12 or 14 ply deep, but Kasparov is looking at long term
>weaknesses. I think black's passed d pawn can be stopped in the long run and
>black will have a tough time coming up with a good plan. Has anyone used a
>program to look at a PV for the position after 14 ... axb6?
>
>KarinsDad :)

Hey man, where you been? Try http://bbs.msnbc.com/bbs/kasparov-team/index.asp
for the latest -- even the jokers are funny! Someones got 440 lines of analysis
after 15. Nc3 (GMs and machines agree it's GK's best move) -- currently Irina
etc are trying to thrust 15. ...b5 on The World, even giving it ! points. My
mate Jon Speelman thinks it's horrible, for what it's worth (FWIW?) I agree. We
like 15. ...Ra8, because after 16. Re1 (which we won't get) there's ...Ra5 17.
Be3 Nd5 18. Nxd5 Rxd5 and maybe 19. Qe2 b5! looking good for Black. Point is,
after 15. ...b5, 16. Re1 is strong, probably forcing 16. ...b4 (also acclaimed)
17. Na4 and White starts to get going against a weak queenside. 15. ...Ra8 is
brilliant! Send in the cavalry! We Need Your Help!! (And Your Digital Friends'
Help!!!)

Francis



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.