Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 1989 opinion poll and idea for new poll question

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 19:21:08 07/15/99

Go up one level in this thread


On July 15, 1999 at 20:39:36, Peter Kappler wrote:

>On July 15, 1999 at 17:31:57, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On July 15, 1999 at 00:27:47, Peter Kappler wrote:
>>
>>>On July 14, 1999 at 16:25:12, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>On July 14, 1999 at 15:13:59, Peter Hegger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hello
>>>>>In 1989, at the world computer chess championship in Edmonton, David Levy asked
>>>>>participants:
>>>>>"In what year do you think a chess program will be able to defeat the human
>>>>>world champion?"
>>>>>Here are the answers.
>>>>>Year    Names
>>>>>1992    Gyula Horvath, Monty Newborn
>>>>>1993    John McCarthy
>>>>>1994    Hans Berliner, Marty Hirsch, Feng-hsuing Hsu
>>>>>1995    Murray Campbell, Larry Kaufmann, David Kittinger, Danny Kopec, Donald
>>>>>       Mitchie, David Slate, Mike Valvo
>>>>>1997    John Stanbeck
>>>>>1998    Kevin O'connell
>>>>>1999    Ed Felton, Tom Pronk, Sidney Samole, Claude Shannon, Jos Uiterwijk
>>>>>2000    Robert Hyatt, GM Kevin Spraggett, Victor Vikhrev, Jaap van den Herik
>>>>>2001    Jurg Nivergelt, Mark Taylor
>>>>>2002    IM Julio Kaplan
>>>>>2005    Richard Lang, Pierre Nolet, Ard van Bergen
>>>>>2008    Harry Nelson
>>>>>2010    Don Dailey, Ossi Weiner
>>>>>2011    Lars Hjorth
>>>>>2013    Tony Scherzer
>>>>>2014    David Levy
>>>>>2020    Tony Marsland
>>>>>2025    Dap Hartmann
>>>>>2030    Franz Morsch
>>>>>2040    Jonathan Schaeffer
>>>>>2050    Harm Bakker
>>>>>2056    Helmut Horacek
>>>>>NEVER   David Cahlander
>>>>>
>>>>>The mean average of these predictions is the year 2005.
>>>>>I thought it might be interesting to formulate a new opinion poll question
>>>>>asking "In what year do you think a computer chess program will be able to
>>>>>defeat the human world champion in a 20 game 40/2 match?"
>>>>>Any feedback is welcome.
>>>>>Regards
>>>>>Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I'd answer 1998.  I think DB would have beaten Kasparov in 20 games just
>>>>as it did in 6 games.  He already had a fork stuck in him by game 5.  He
>>>>was "done" I think...
>>>
>>>
>>>Surely this would not have been your prediction before that match...
>>>
>>>--Peter
>>
>>
>>
>>Nope... I originally guessed 2000.
>
>Yes, but you were guessing when a machine would beat the World Champion in a
>single game, *not* a 20 game match.  Very different scenarios...
>


Actually not.  I believe at the time, we were talking about beating the
world champion in a match, not a single game.  We already thought that a
single game was doable...  several of us had already beaten GM players in
40/2hr type time controls...




>
>>  And thought before the match that Kasparov
>> would win.  But DB II was _much_ better than
>> DB I.  And with "hindsight" I think DB would have won a 20 game match.
>
>
>Overall, I think Kasparov played better than DB in that match, but he was unable
>to convert good positions in games 3, 4, and 5.  In Garry's entire career, he's
>probably never had 3 games in a row like that where he was significantly better,
>yet unable to push through to win.  I think it demoralized and confused him,
>leading to the disaster in game 6.  Hard to say if he would have regained his
>composure and fought back in a longer match.
>
>In a 20-game match, I'd still pick Kasparov to win.  Guess we'll never know...
>
>
>--Peter



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.