Author: blass uri
Date: 02:59:27 07/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 1999 at 20:52:37, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >On July 14, 1999 at 16:54:32, Martin Müller wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Hopefully not boring all with this tournament result I give you the outcoming >>hereafter: >> >>Hi73_F32_stand_01 1999 >> >> 123456789012345678901234567890 >>1 Fritz 5.32 000½0001½001101½11½1½11111½011 17.0/30 >>2 Hiarcs 7.32 111½1110½110010½00½0½00000½100 13.0/30 > >> >>Conditions: >>Hardware >>K6 II 400 MHz 192 MB RAM, 64 MB RAM for each engine >__________________________________________ > >According to the formula for Fritz, the amount of megs for hash tables should be >144 at 40/2 and on a 400MHz processor. This formula is stated in the manual for >Fritz, and I would say that 64 megs is quite insufficient at your time control >and processor speed. > >Regards, >Mel >____________________________________________ Hiarcs can also earn from more than 64Mbytes so it is not fair to give Fritz more ram than Hiarcs and it is impossible to give both programs 144 Mbytes because the tester's hardware has not enough memory for it. Uri > > >> >>Book >>Book out of Mega 98, Research DB 1,3 Mio Games, ChessBase Mag 55-70, >>Depth up to 30 moves, 2 GB File-Size, no learn, write-protected. >> >>5 GAMES LOST BY HIARCS 7.32 DUE TO "TIME". It did simply not move after having >>finished the opening. >> >>correct result according to my own opponion: >> >>Fritz 5.32 12 >>Hiarcsl 7.32 13 >> >> >>Kind regards, >> >>Martin Müller >> >> >>P.S.: Feedback wellcome.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.