Author: Harald Faber
Date: 03:30:39 07/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 1999 at 05:46:03, Paulo Soares wrote:
>On July 15, 1999 at 10:45:52, Harald Faber wrote:
>
>>[Event "Dortmund"]
>>[Site "?"]
>>[Date "????.??.??"]
>>[Round "?"]
>>[White "Leko"]
>>[Black "Timman"]
>>[Result "*"]
>>[ECO "C42"]
>>[Annotator "Faber"]
>>[PlyCount "43"]
>>
>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5 d6 4. Nf3 Nxe4 5. d4 d5 6. Bd3 Nc6 7. O-O Be7 8.
>>Re1 Bg4 9. c3 f5 10. Qb3 Qd6 11. Nfd2 O-O-O 12. f3 Ne5 13. Qc2 Bh4 14. Rf1 Nxd3
>>15. Qxd3 Rhf8 16. fxe4 (16. fxg4 fxg4 17. Rxf8 Qxf8 18. Nxe4 dxe4 19. Qe2 Qf5
>>20. Be3 $18) 16... fxe4 17. Qe3 h6 (17... Qa6 $1 18. g3 Bg5 19. Qxg5 Qe2 20.
>>Qh4 $8 20... h5 $1 { Pg7-g5 -+} (20... e3 $19 21. Nf3 21... h5 {
>>over and out, z.B.} 22. Na3 (22. Nbd2 g5 23. Nxg5 (23. Qxg5 Bh3) 23... Rxf1+
>>24. Nxf1 Qf2+ 25. Kh1 Qxf1#) 22... Rxf3 23. Rxf3 Qxf3)) 18. Na3 Bg5 19. Qe1 e3
>>20. Nf3 Bxf3 21. Rxf3 Rxf3 22. gxf3 *
>
>
>Harald, game very pretty and complicated.
I know but with many resources. Certainy a better choice than h7-h6. Anyway I
wouldn't have found Qa6 either and am very amazed of Hiarcs' capabilities.
>Below I place my analyses,
>that had been made with the aid of Fritz5.32 and Hiarcs7.32:
>
>[Event "Dortmund"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "????.??.??"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "Leko"]
>[Black "Timman"]
>[Result "*"]
>[ECO "C42"]
>[Annotator "Faber and Soares"]
>[PlyCount "43"]
>
>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5 d6 4. Nf3 Nxe4 5. d4 d5 6. Bd3 Nc6 7. O-O Be7 8.
>Re1 Bg4 9. c3 f5 10. Qb3 Qd6 11. Nfd2 O-O-O 12. f3 Ne5 13. Qc2 Bh4 14. Rf1 Nxd3
>15. Qxd3 Rhf8 16. fxe4 (16. fxg4 fxg4 (16... Nf2 !? 17. Rxf2 Bxf2+ 18. Kxf2
>fxg4+ 19. Ke1 Rde8+ 20. Kd1 Qxh2 unclear) 17. Rxf8 Qxf8 18. Nxe4 dxe4 19. Qe2
>Qf5
>20. Be3 $18) 16... fxe4 17. Qe3 h6 (17... Qa6 $1 18. g3 (18. c4!? Rxf1+ 19. Nxf1
>Rf8 20. Ng3 Qf6 21. Nd2 Bg5 22. Qe1 Qxd4+ 23. Kh1 unclear) 18... Bg5 19. Qxg5
>Qe2
>20. Qh4 $8 h5 $1 {Pg7-g5 -+} (20... e3 $19 21. Nf3 h5 {over and out, z.B.} 22.
>Na3 (22. Nbd2 g5 23. Nxg5 (23. Qxg5 Bh3) 23... Rxf1+ 24. Nxf1 Qf2+ 25. Kh1
>Qxf1#) 22... Rxf3 23. Rxf3 Qxf3)) 18. Na3 Bg5 19. Qe1 e3 20. Nf3 Bxf3 21. Rxf3
>Rxf3 22. gxf3 *
>
>My analysis:
>
>(16. fxg4 fxg4 ? (16... Nf2 !? 17. Rxf2 Bxf2+ 18. Kxf2
>fxg4+ 19. Ke1 Rde8+ 20. Kd1 Qxh2 unclear))
Looks also good.
>(17... Qa6 !? 18. g3? (18. c4!? Rxf1+ 19. Nxf1
>Rf8 20. Ng3 Qf6 21. Nd2 Bg5 22. Qe1 Qxd4+ 23. Kh1 unclear)
Black can get 3 pawns for the piece, 2 connected passed pawns. They may be very
dangerous. (23...Bxd2 24.Bxd2 Qxc4) But it doesn't seem to be clear.
At the moment Hiarcs prefers 20...Bxg3 with an equal position.
20...Bxg3 21.Qxg3 Rf1+ 22.Kxf1 Qxc4+ 23.Kf2 Qe2+ and draw by 3x repitition.
However these analysis show that black would have had MUCH better chances than
in the game.
>Paulo Soares, from Brazil
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.