Author: Melvin S. Schwartz
Date: 18:56:29 07/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 17, 1999 at 11:16:52, blass uri wrote: > >On July 16, 1999 at 17:59:42, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > ><snipped> >>I don't believe Hiarcs depends on hash tables as much as Fritz does; in fact, >>this is what has been said by technical support at Chessbase, and technical >>support at Gambitsoft. > >I do not know. >I do not believe chessbase about it. > >I know that 64MB halped Hiarcs significantly even at blitz time control(see >james walker games) >so I believe that in games 144 MB can help Hiarcs in tournament time control. ____________________ If you don't want to believe representatives from Chessbase, I will not argue with you. :) However, I still feel that the amount of megs available for hash tables is more critical in Fritz. Perhaps that is why it has been reported that Fritz will lose on time while Hiarcs generally does not - just a guess. Mel > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.