Author: Laurence Chen
Date: 02:50:57 07/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 19, 1999 at 03:33:29, Harald Faber wrote: >On July 18, 1999 at 16:21:27, Laurence Chen wrote: > >>As I was practicing my chess tactics with CT-ART 3.0, position #540 caught my >>attention. Below is the FEN of the position. My chess engines were unable to >>find the best move 1. Nxe6!, and what was even more incredible was the fact >>after playing the move 1. Nxe6!, Hiarcs 7.32 insists in playing the blunder move >>1. ... Rxc4 ??? which allows White to mate in 6 with 2. Nh6+!. Fritz 5.32 and >>Junior 5 have no problem to see that 1. ... Rxc4 ??? is a terrible blunder which >>leads to mate. > >Here Hiarcs7.32 NEVER considers 1...Rxc4?? >From D=2/14 up to 9/27 within 6 min ALWAYS 1...f6 shown. >Ah! Now I see: my observation is in analysis mode while yours is in playmode! >In play mode Hiarcs indeed shows the surprising move 1...Rxc4 and changes after >52sec (P2-350) to fxe6 but with -10.34 and then to h7-h5 -10.14. >This reminds me on antother position with similar strange differences between >analysis and play mode. Astonishing tha such a behaviour doesn't harm Hiarcs' >play more. > >I would really like to hear Bobs and especially Marks explanations to that. > >>1nr3k1/1q1nbppp/p3p3/8/2RNP1N1/1P2QPP1/1B4KP/8 w - - 0 1 >> >>Laurence Thanks Harald for understanding my posting. I'm not saying that 1. Nxe6 is better than 1. Nf5, CT-Art 3.0 gives 1. Nxe6 as the best move. However, it's Hiarcs strange behaviour which puzzles me. Laurence
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.