Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 13:08:38 07/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 19, 1999 at 13:28:27, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On July 19, 1999 at 06:14:45, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >[snip] > >>I'm quite positive my 8 probe hashtable works excellent. >> >>I'm quite sure i investigated MTD very well. >> >>So what are we talking about? >> >>i give 2 reasons why MTD sucks bigtime for my program namely: >> - it searches space PVS doesn't search; called overhead >> - it's worst case behaviour is simply losing games for me, >> as in *some* positions where it's already tough to search with PVS >> it is only busy researching and researching to get a bound. >> >>The only thing you say then is that i'm not using hashtables? >>Comon drop dead. > >This isn't what I said. I think it's clear you didn't read what I wrote very >carefully. Oh well, it's not my problem. I posted a position with analyzes here. I'll post it again if you need, please let your proggie search 20 ply just using NULLMOVE R=3 and your beloved MTD, then we can talk. >[snip] >Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.