Author: Harald Faber
Date: 00:09:58 07/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 1999 at 11:09:58, Umar Farooq wrote: >On July 20, 1999 at 04:52:22, allan johnson wrote: > >>On July 19, 1999 at 19:49:29, Marc van Hal wrote: >> >>>I now changed the queen valeu to 10 and the rook to 5.2 >>I'd be interested in some comparative games and analyses of positions if >> you wouldn't mind.I'm sure such changes in the valuation of the pieces >> will bring about fairly dramatic positional and tactical play on the part >>of computers.My guess is that programmes will start playing a bit erratically >>on these settings but I'll stand corrected if any tests you conduct show >>otherwise >>Cheers Allan > >It gives interesting game but I think its unfair with knight to give him >only 3 points. Points comparison should be like this one > >pawn = 1 >bishop = 3 >knight = 4 >rook = 5.5 >queen = 9.5 > >Umar A knight isn't worth one pawn more than a bishop, it is even vice versa (but not ONE pawn)... (I know that it depends on the position but in general this is correct)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.