Author: blass uri
Date: 02:44:30 07/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 1999 at 03:07:53, Harald Faber wrote: >On July 20, 1999 at 18:02:32, blass uri wrote: > >>>>Ok, I will bite... I think Rebel's default settings through the years >>>>vary from 90-95% being optimal. >>>> >>>>I claim that the same also counts for very other chess program. >>> >>>Except for one or two... ;-) (King and CSTal) >> >>I do not understand why do you think that the king and cstal can earn more than >>other programs from changing the setting. >>Uri > >Uri, you don't understand many things and keep disagreeing with others, really >funny. :-) > >I am sure that CSTal and the King could profit from adjusted settings because >there are so many parameters to be tuned so that I assume that the programmers >didn't have the time and the intention to adjust them. The source code of the king and tal is not free so you cannot know the number of parameters that they have in their programs if they do not tell it. I have no information if they have more or less parameters then other programs like Hiarcs or Mchess. The number of parameters that you can tune as a user in chessmaster is bigger but it does not prove that the number of real parameters is bigger. There are also many parameters that you cannot tune as a user in chessmaster. I believe that chessmaster like many programs use piece square tables in the evaluation function and you cannot tune these hundreds of numbers Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.