Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 03:40:17 07/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
>Posted by Harald Faber on July 20, 1999 at 04:44:28: >Clear, but it is too much work for only one man. >I think a good idea would be to build kind of Rebel user group and create >sub-groups which have to try different areas, e.g. one is simply adjusting the >king safety, another one the passed pawns etc., more combinations possible of >course. No way. If you for instance change mobility you seriously should consider to change pawn structure too. A higher mobility (for example) would favor open rook files which in return could cause the program to accept double pawns too easy. So all of these functions in some way are related to each other. >Just an idea. And of course it probably needs more testers than >available and willing. :-) I know, that's why I thought some (encourage) prize money is justified :-) Ed Schroder
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.