Author: Mark Young
Date: 19:21:31 07/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 1999 at 20:28:38, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >On July 19, 1999 at 03:04:16, Mark Young wrote: > >>On July 19, 1999 at 02:19:31, blass uri wrote: >> >>> >>>On July 19, 1999 at 01:53:47, blass uri wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I think that something is wrong in your system because my hiarcs7.32 can see >>>>mate in 6 against itself in 59 seconds and I understood that your hiarcs cannot >>>>see it and even after the blunder needs 2 minutes to see the mate in 6 and your >>>>pentium233 is faster then my pentium200. >>> >>>I found that after Rxc4 even hiarcs6 needs only few seconds to find mate in 6 >>>and of course Hiarcs7.32 can see the mate in 6 in a few seconds. >>> >>>Uri >> >>I think I understand what they are talking about, but it is a bogus slam against >>Hiarcs7. My Hiarcs7 see the mate after the move Rxc4 in about 12 secs. The >____________________________ > >Mark, apparently something has gotten lost along the way here. Mr. Chen's post >was about Hiarcs 7.32 making the blunder move Rxc4. That was what baffled him. >And that is the real issue since as he stated both Fritz and Junior saw Rxc4 as >a blunder move. Nothing has gotten lost. Fritz saw the blunder, junior saw the blunder, and Yes Hiarcs 7.32 saw the blunder of Rxc4, on my system in 12 seconds. There is no point to this thread. "Hiarcs 7.32 unable to see mate in its evaluation." This is the title of the thread, and in this case with Hiarcs 7.32 it is clearly false. > >Regards, >Mel > > > >>problem is the next best moves also lead to mate, or heave losses. So it take >>time for it to chose another move, but they all lose. >> >>p.s. >>In the position, the programs choice on how to win this position is also very >>strong Nf5!. Is this weaker then Nxe6! ? Hmmm.
This page took 0.33 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.