Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 21:08:26 07/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 1999 at 23:37:55, Mark Young wrote: >On July 21, 1999 at 22:38:23, Tania Devora wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>Very Interesting games Victor, please continue doing your games, I am one of the >>most interested person in following your games, Does what I have been trying to >>explain here, Hiarcs7.32 is superior than Fritz, It doesnt only play a very >>great positional game, but is very good in tactics, being today the most solid >>and strong program available. >> >>Hiarcs supremacy isn't very very big, but is noturious. >> >>I want to see Hiarcs playing in yor other machine (500 Mhz), I am sure it will >>kick Fritz ass. >> >>Sorry for my vocabulary, but is true. >> >>Please continue postings games. >> >>Greetings ! >> >>Tania > >I'm not at all interested in this match, the hardware is not the same. How do we >know Hiarcs 7.32 would have won if it too played on a 500 mhz computer. Yes it >can win on a 200 mhz computer, but that does not mean it could win if played on >equal hardware and both being 500 mhz computers. Hiarcs 7.32 is optimized to run >on a 200 mhz computer so it has the advantage. ------ Mark, He did say that he was giving an equall amount of games to be played on"both" machines, so if Hiarcs beat Fritz using the 200Mhz machine then it should even play better chess on a faster machine. Fritz had its chance with the 500Mhz and lost but the testers should realize that you need atleast 100 to 200 games to prove which Program is "possibly" better!! ---- Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.