Author: KarinsDad
Date: 14:22:17 07/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 1999 at 03:34:04, alfred palang wrote: >why won't we go ahead and take these posts out? Good question Alfred. Two reasons: 1) The original post although apparently untrue, was about the moderation of a member which is always on topic. The way Kenneth presented it and his second post was a little strong, but since I did not know whether it was true or not (it was quickly shown to be not true when K1 posted), the information may have been valid. 2) I am moderating with a relatively light hand at the moment and more or less following through on my moderation stance. The moderators will be at this for 7 months and the last thing we need is to be accused of being delete happy. So, I am basically sticking to my moderation stance and mostly deleting abusive and profane posts. However, it IS important, at the same time, to cut this type of stuff out early, hence my decision to ask people to not respond. I think we can all handle most of the obnoxious posts and we can all decide (with a small reminder from a moderator) to ignore them. I have deleted one thread so far and Bruce has deleted at least one post, so we are not just totally sitting back, but at the same time, we are trying to minimize the controversies. Hopefully, this helps. KarinsDad :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.