Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Three's a crowd?

Author: Peter McKenzie

Date: 07:58:21 07/23/99

Go up one level in this thread


On July 23, 1999 at 01:58:25, KarinsDad wrote:

>On July 23, 1999 at 00:33:51, Peter McKenzie wrote:
>
>>With Fernando resigning as moderator we have, for the third consecutive
>>moderation period, one of the moderators resigning.
>>
>>Last moderation period, I resigned (with about 1.5 months to go).  This isn't
>>widely known as I didn't post about it on this board (I wasn't keen on
>>disrupting the group, hopefully its not such an issue now).
>>
>>The period before that Bruce resigned, also near the end of his term.
>>
>>I think all three resignations were at least in part related to differences
>>between the members of the moderation team.  Its fair to say that the 3 man
>>moderation team concept isn't working very well from a team perspective.
>
>I had heard that you resigned since you often got outvoted 2 to 1. Is this true?

I don't think so, we didn't often vote on matters from memory.

>If so, why are you recommending a solution below where moderators have to vote
>on deletions?

In any case I wasn't recommending the voting system (although after further
thought I am liking it more), I was merely putting a couple of ideas 'on the
table'.

>
>>
>>Perhaps we could look at changes to the moderation system in an effort to avoid
>>this sort of thing happening in the future.  Here are some ideas:
>>
>>- Each moderator has a period of 2 months where only they can delete posts.
>
>Who moderates the rogue moderator then? Both deletions (the thread and the
>individual post) were a direct result of Fernando posting something that did or
>could offend someone (and I was not blameless in the thread).
>
>>
>>- at least 2 moderators must agree before deleting a post.
>>
>>The disadvantage of both of these ideas is that they reduce the chance that a
>>really stupid message is deleted quickly.  Perhaps this isn't such a big price
>>to pay for a more harmonious system.
>
>I think the system CAN be harmonious. I think that Fernando should have just

Sure the system CAN be harmonious, but I don't think that it is LIKELY. I'm not
totally confident in the current system, based on what I've seen so far.

>resigned for personal reasons if he felt that strongly. There are a lot of
>people who spout off about personal rights and offenses, but are too blind to
>see when they are offending others.
>
>It is NOT the moderators who always cause the problem, they are just convenient
>targets for the real people who do. It is ALWAYS the same people jumping on the
>anti-moderator bandwagon whenever a problem occurs.

I'm not saying the moderators always cause the problem.  I'm saying that the
current moderation system isn't making things any easier for the moderators.

>
>And quite frankly, I can still count on one hand the number of Emails that we
>have received about inappropriate posts. The problems with moderators resigning
>are generally not due to the forum, but appear to be with individual moderators
>and their own personal problems with the job. Part of the job may be that you
>may not be moderating like you thought you would or should. But, quite frankly,
>that is up to the individual moderator and the group elected. If the period of
>time is too long, or the person does not want to vote for deletions or whatever,
>then you will still have resignations. There is NO solution that will work for
>everyone and these attempts to come up with one are kind of silly.

Hmm, I think its silly to stick with a poor system without at least considering
the possibility that there is a better system available.

>
>Just let the moderators do their job. Just let moderators who are frustrated
>quit. Just let the system work without attempting to tweak it when it is OBVIOUS
>that practically no matter what you do, it will not work for all candidates in
>the future.

Sure no system is perfect, but some are better than others.
By 'tweaking' the current moderation system, I think we can significantly reduce
the number of problems we will see in the future.

>
>>
>>cheers,
>>Peter
>
>KarinsDad :)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.