Author: Melvin S. Schwartz
Date: 21:14:32 07/23/99
The game as I stated in my original post was at 40/2. Hiarcs selected a4 and after making the move its score dropped to a minus. I therefore allowed Hiarcs to replay the move. Hiarcs then selected Rf1. I again let Hiarcs replay the move and again it selected Rf1. Now, I believe it is quite evident that Hiarcs learning function did not allow it to replay a4 and insisted on playing Rf1. If you think a4 was not a bad move, then how come Hiarcs would not play it again and insisted on Rf1? By the way, your headline in the post to me is not appreciated. I expected an intelligent discussion about this and not some silly rhetoric. You asked for examples and I gave you some. You insist on dwelling on this trying to dispute even the program you are raving about. Hiarcs recognized a4 was bad and that's why it wouldn't play it again - unless you have some better explanation? Regards, Mel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.