Author: Pete Galati
Date: 22:10:03 07/23/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 1999 at 00:35:39, Anthony Boynes wrote: >On July 23, 1999 at 23:51:25, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On July 23, 1999 at 23:22:10, Roger D Davis wrote: >> >>>Since this issue is so divisive, perhaps we should put Fernando's post up and >>>have a vote on whether it should be deleted or reinstated. >>> >>>The question seems to polarize the strict versus lenient camps in CCC, so maybe >>>we can use the results to calibrate the threshold of moderation closer to what >>>the majority desires, whatever the result is. >>> >>>Roger >> >>That's ridiculous, you're not thinking clearly. >> >>Pete > > >Constructive criticism at its finest. RGCC is looking better and better. That was very undiplomatic of me to put it that way, my appologies to Roger, but you know, I'm getting tired of hearing about Fernando's joke. It really wouldn't be doing Fernando any favors by putting it back up. As far as RGCC goes, it could be worse. There's almost no talk about the programing side of Chess programs, it's more from the program user's perspective. To get it just type in: news:rec.games.chess.computer but don't blame me if you do or don't like it. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.