Author: Roger D Davis
Date: 03:05:06 07/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 1999 at 00:50:54, Dave Gomboc wrote: >Two out of the three moderators thought it was inappropriate. Isn't that >adequate? > >Before the objection arises: no, it's not every time that two out of three >moderators agree with my viewpoint. Sometimes it's only 0 or 1. :) > >Dave That's exactly the point, it wasn't adequate. The divisiveness of the issue has already shown that, as evidenced by the huge debate that took place about it. KarinsDad even pointed to more strict and more lenient camps here in CCC. As for as the "two of three" agrument goes, that was established after the fact (I had suggested earlier, in a post that you replied to, that two of three be established before the fact...the fact of deletion, that is). You might read Amir Ban's post, as well. Moreover, it costs only a little bit of HTML code and text to do it, and the information return on the investment is tremendous, and the time could not more opportune. I say use Fernando's post as the acid test of what should be allowed and let the CCC members speak for what they want... I don't know how it's going to turn out, but either way, it gives the moderators a mandate for moderating. Roger
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.