Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 03:54:09 07/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 1999 at 06:05:06, Roger D Davis wrote: >On July 24, 1999 at 00:50:54, Dave Gomboc wrote: > > >>Two out of the three moderators thought it was inappropriate. Isn't that >>adequate? >> >>Before the objection arises: no, it's not every time that two out of three >>moderators agree with my viewpoint. Sometimes it's only 0 or 1. :) >> >>Dave > > >That's exactly the point, it wasn't adequate. The divisiveness of the issue has >already shown that, as evidenced by the huge debate that took place about it. >KarinsDad even pointed to more strict and more lenient camps here in CCC. I think it was adequate. >As for as the "two of three" agrument goes, that was established after the fact >(I had suggested earlier, in a post that you replied to, that two of three be >established before the fact...the fact of deletion, that is). You might read >Amir Ban's post, as well. I did -- and replied. >Moreover, it costs only a little bit of HTML code and text to do it, and the >information return on the investment is tremendous, and the time could not more >opportune. > >I say use Fernando's post as the acid test of what should be allowed and let the >CCC members speak for what they want... I don't know how it's going to turn out, >but either way, it gives the moderators a mandate for moderating. > >Roger Moderators ran on a platform. Bruce is just being consistent with how he's always moderated, and he had the most votes by a fair margin. I'd say he had the mandate he needs already. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.