Author: James Swafford
Date: 09:20:19 07/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
Using Dann's executable on my K6-2/400: 57,019 nps. Dann : what compiler did you use, and with what options? That's over 50% faster than CygWin with the -O flag. -- James On July 23, 1999 at 14:49:20, Will Singleton wrote: >Results, so far, for the TSCP nps test: > >Platform Compiler nps > >Mac G3/300 CW 3.1 opt 40,519 >P2/300 msvc opt 38,223 >K6-2/400 cygwin opt 37,516 >P2/300 gcc opt 29,205 >K6-2/400 msvc no opt 28,745 >K6-2/400 cygwin no opt 23,885 >K5/116 gcc -0 17,200 >P6/200 watcom opt 16,018 > >Can anyone beat the Mac G3? I'm surprised the K6/400 isn't as fast as the >P2/300 (though different compilers were used). > >I would really like to see a few more machines here, as well as get >corroborating results from similar machines. Please submit results here or by >email. > >For those of you willing to participate, here's the method I followed: > >Download TSCP v1.3. ( http://ucsu.colorado.edu/~kerrigat/ ) >Modify the procedure Think() in search.c to: > search 6 ply. > Calculate and display NPS. >Compile using optimize on. >Run TSCP, and type ON. > >Thanks. > >Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.