Author: Mark Young
Date: 09:40:32 07/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 1999 at 06:36:46, blass uri wrote: > >On July 24, 1999 at 06:21:39, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On July 24, 1999 at 04:43:06, Terry Ripple wrote: >> >>>Hi Mel, >>> I did exactly as you instructed and ran it from that Position on 40/2hr. and >>>when Hiarcs7.32 made the move a4 (0.59/9), i then left Hiarcs continue to think >>>on my time as if i was playing Hiarcs in a tournament setting and at no time did >>>Hiarcs ever think it was in the "negative" and in fact Hiarcs kept a small >>>plus(.46/10) for up to a "full 10 min." of its thinking on my time! I then >>>repeated the same position before the move a4 and Hiarcs "STILL" wants to make >>>the very "Same Move"- "a4". The position learning was working because before it >>>showed in its analysis 2.a4, Nd7 3.a5, etc. but after i left it think on my time >>>and tried the position once again it then was showing 2.a4, Nd7 3.Nf5,etc. >>> This leads me to believe that if Mark and i are getting the same conclusions >>>from our Hiarcs Program, that it dont take a "Rocket Scientist" to draw a >>>conclusion that there must be something thats conflicting in your Hiarcs set-up! >>> >>>Regards, Terry >> >>I gave my hiarcs7.32 64 Mb hash tables and some hours on my pentium200 and at >>depth 11/30 it wants to play >>Rb1 instead of a4. >> >>I did not look at the screen so I do not know when Hiarcs changed its mind >> >>Uri >Now it wants to play Rf1 at the same depth with evaluation 0.31 after more than >3 hours The game was played at 40/2. The question is not if hiarcs 7.32 will play Rf1, the question is, is a4 played by Hiarcs 7.32 at 40/2 a blunder? This was the claim. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.