Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To Melvin Schwartz, Part 4 - Possibly your Hiarcs has a Corrupted File!!

Author: Mark Young

Date: 11:01:40 07/24/99

Go up one level in this thread


On July 24, 1999 at 13:50:20, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote:

>
>On July 24, 1999 at 04:43:06, Terry Ripple wrote:
>
>>Hi Mel,
>>  I did exactly as you instructed and ran it from that Position on 40/2hr. and
>>when Hiarcs7.32 made the move a4 (0.59/9), i then left Hiarcs continue to think
>>on my time as if i was playing Hiarcs in a tournament setting and at no time did
>>Hiarcs ever think it was in the "negative" and in fact Hiarcs kept a small
>>plus(.46/10) for up to a "full 10 min." of its thinking on my time! I then
>>repeated the same position before the move a4 and Hiarcs "STILL" wants to make
>>the very "Same Move"- "a4". The position learning was working because before it
>>showed in its analysis 2.a4, Nd7 3.a5, etc. but after i left it think on my time
>>and tried the position once again it then was showing 2.a4, Nd7 3.Nf5,etc.
>>  This leads me to believe that if Mark and i are getting the same conclusions
>>from our Hiarcs Program, that it dont take a "Rocket Scientist" to draw a
>>conclusion that there must be something thats conflicting in your Hiarcs set-up!
>>
>>Regards, Terry
>
>Something wrong with my set up? Interesting. Now, what could possibly be wrong?
>You tell me. I was playing the game and after a4 the score went down and so I
>let Hiarcs repeat the move twice and twice it played Rf1 with a plus score.
>That's it. Period. Now, the other move by Hiarcs in this game, which Hiarcs
>played and stayed, was 20.Qd2. Do you or your friend who is PA State Champion
>think that was a good move?

Stop jumping ship, You are the one making claims about Hiarcs 7.32. Before we
now jump to 3rd position you need to retract your claims on the first two
position, or show us lines why the Hiarcs 7.32 moves were a blunder. I have not
even looked at the 3rd position yet, as I am Taking the Time to analyse the
positions. I know Hiarcs 7.32 plays blunders, the interesting question is, how
many positions of yours much we look at before your claim becomes true.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.