Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To Melvin Schwartz, Part 4 - Possibly your Hiarcs has a Corrupted File!!

Author: Melvin S. Schwartz

Date: 11:39:46 07/24/99

Go up one level in this thread



On July 24, 1999 at 14:08:16, Mark Young wrote:

>On July 24, 1999 at 14:00:11, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote:
>
>>
>>On July 24, 1999 at 12:40:32, Mark Young wrote:
>>
>>>On July 24, 1999 at 06:36:46, blass uri wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>On July 24, 1999 at 06:21:39, blass uri wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On July 24, 1999 at 04:43:06, Terry Ripple wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi Mel,
>>>>>>  I did exactly as you instructed and ran it from that Position on 40/2hr. and
>>>>>>when Hiarcs7.32 made the move a4 (0.59/9), i then left Hiarcs continue to think
>>>>>>on my time as if i was playing Hiarcs in a tournament setting and at no time did
>>>>>>Hiarcs ever think it was in the "negative" and in fact Hiarcs kept a small
>>>>>>plus(.46/10) for up to a "full 10 min." of its thinking on my time! I then
>>>>>>repeated the same position before the move a4 and Hiarcs "STILL" wants to make
>>>>>>the very "Same Move"- "a4". The position learning was working because before it
>>>>>>showed in its analysis 2.a4, Nd7 3.a5, etc. but after i left it think on my time
>>>>>>and tried the position once again it then was showing 2.a4, Nd7 3.Nf5,etc.
>>>>>>  This leads me to believe that if Mark and i are getting the same conclusions
>>>>>>from our Hiarcs Program, that it dont take a "Rocket Scientist" to draw a
>>>>>>conclusion that there must be something thats conflicting in your Hiarcs set-up!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Regards, Terry
>>>>>
>>>>>I gave my hiarcs7.32 64 Mb hash tables and some hours on my pentium200 and at
>>>>>depth 11/30 it wants to play
>>>>>Rb1 instead of a4.
>>>>>
>>>>>I did not look at the screen so I do not know when Hiarcs changed its mind
>>>>>
>>>>>Uri
>>>>Now it wants to play Rf1 at the same depth with evaluation 0.31 after more than
>>>>3 hours
>>>
>>>The game was played at 40/2. The question is not if hiarcs 7.32 will play Rf1,
>>>the question is, is a4 played by Hiarcs 7.32 at 40/2 a blunder? This was the
>>>claim.
>>_______________
>>
>>Now, Mark, you insisted Hiarcs only chose a4, so how come we now have Mr. Blass
>>reporting that after 3 hours it wants to play Rf1?
>>
>>Mark, when I posted the examples for you, I used the words "bad move". Now, I
>>gave you the reason why I said that because Hiarcs changed from a4 to Rf1. Very
>>simple. Also, in this same game at move 20 Hiarcs played and it stayed Qd2 - Do
>>you think that was a good move?
>>
>>>>
>>>>Uri
>
>Hey, slow person. Terry and I followed your instructions,
__________________

Okay, Mark, as in the past you once again resort to using distasteful comments.
I will not lower myself to your level of thinking and use similar words in
response. I am only interested in debating an issue with someone who does not
look to inflame the argument with degrading remarks. I have many more important
things to do than to continue this issue and accept your insulting remarks.

____________________________________________________

and it was not to see
>what Hiarcs 7.32 would play after 3 hours. My Hiarcs 7.32 still plays a4 for the
>full 11 plys. So explain that.
>
>New position
>rnbk3r/pp4bp/1qp2pP1/3p3B/4p2N/2P5/PPP3PP/R1BQK2R w KQ - 0 1
>
>Analysis by Hiarcs 7.32:
>
>12.Rf1 hxg6 13.Nxg6
>  ²  (0.45)   depth: 1   00:00:00
>12.Rf1 hxg6 13.Nxg6
>  ²  (0.45)   depth: 2/5   00:00:00
>12.Rf1 hxg6 13.Nxg6
>  ²  (0.45)   depth: 3/9   00:00:00
>12.Rf1 Be6
>  =  (0.20)   depth: 4/10   00:00:00
>12.Rf1 Be6 13.Qe2 hxg6 14.Nxg6
>  =  (0.01)   depth: 4/10   00:00:00
>12.g3 Bd7 13.Qd4 hxg6 14.Bxg6
>  =  (0.14)   depth: 4/10   00:00:00
>12.g3 Bd7 13.Qe2 c5 14.Bg4
>  =  (0.01)   depth: 5/17   00:00:00  8kN
>12.Rb1 Be6 13.Bf4 hxg6 14.Nxg6
>  ²  (0.28)   depth: 5/17   00:00:01  42kN
>12.Rb1 Qa5 13.Bf4 Qxa2 14.0-0 Na6
>  =  (0.23)   depth: 6/21   00:00:02  69kN
>12.Rb1 hxg6 13.Nxg6 Rh7 14.Bf4 Be6 15.Qe2 c5
>  ²  (0.41)   depth: 7/23   00:00:06  211kN
>12.Rb1 Nd7
>  =  (0.16)   depth: 8/25   00:00:14  477kN
>12.Rb1 Nd7 13.Bf4 Ne5 14.gxh7 Rxh7
>  =  (0.08)   depth: 8/27   00:00:17  595kN
>12.a4 a5 13.Ra3 hxg6
>  ²  (0.31)   depth: 8/27   00:01:13  2397kN
>12.a4 Nd7 13.a5 Qc5 14.Qe2 Ne5 15.Be3 Qd6 16.gxh7 Nc4 17.Ng6 Rxh7
>  ²  (0.26)   depth: 9/27   00:01:56  3805kN
>12.a4 hxg6 13.Nxg6 Rh7 14.a5 Qc5 15.Bf4 Na6 16.Rf1 Qb5 17.b3 Qc5 18.c4 Qb4+
>19.Kf2
>  ²  (0.35)   depth: 10/29   00:05:40  10900kN
>12.a4 Nd7
>  =  (0.10)   depth: 11/30   00:11:01  21447kN
>12.a4 Nd7 13.a5 Qc5 14.Nf5 Ne5 15.Nxg7 hxg6 16.a6
>  =  (0.09)   depth: 11/30   00:13:13  25871kN
>
>(Young,  7/24/99)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.