Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 12:29:02 07/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 1999 at 14:00:11, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >On July 24, 1999 at 12:40:32, Mark Young wrote: > >>On July 24, 1999 at 06:36:46, blass uri wrote: >> >>> >>>On July 24, 1999 at 06:21:39, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>On July 24, 1999 at 04:43:06, Terry Ripple wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi Mel, >>>>> I did exactly as you instructed and ran it from that Position on 40/2hr. and >>>>>when Hiarcs7.32 made the move a4 (0.59/9), i then left Hiarcs continue to think >>>>>on my time as if i was playing Hiarcs in a tournament setting and at no time did >>>>>Hiarcs ever think it was in the "negative" and in fact Hiarcs kept a small >>>>>plus(.46/10) for up to a "full 10 min." of its thinking on my time! I then >>>>>repeated the same position before the move a4 and Hiarcs "STILL" wants to make >>>>>the very "Same Move"- "a4". The position learning was working because before it >>>>>showed in its analysis 2.a4, Nd7 3.a5, etc. but after i left it think on my time >>>>>and tried the position once again it then was showing 2.a4, Nd7 3.Nf5,etc. >>>>> This leads me to believe that if Mark and i are getting the same conclusions >>>>>from our Hiarcs Program, that it dont take a "Rocket Scientist" to draw a >>>>>conclusion that there must be something thats conflicting in your Hiarcs set-up! >>>>> >>>>>Regards, Terry >>>> >>>>I gave my hiarcs7.32 64 Mb hash tables and some hours on my pentium200 and at >>>>depth 11/30 it wants to play >>>>Rb1 instead of a4. >>>> >>>>I did not look at the screen so I do not know when Hiarcs changed its mind >>>> >>>>Uri >>>Now it wants to play Rf1 at the same depth with evaluation 0.31 after more than >>>3 hours >> >>The game was played at 40/2. The question is not if hiarcs 7.32 will play Rf1, >>the question is, is a4 played by Hiarcs 7.32 at 40/2 a blunder? This was the >>claim. >_______________ > >Now, Mark, you insisted Hiarcs only chose a4, so how come we now have Mr. Blass >reporting that after 3 hours it wants to play Rf1? > >Mark, when I posted the examples for you, I used the words "bad move". Now, I >gave you the reason why I said that because Hiarcs changed from a4 to Rf1. Very >simple. Also, in this same game at move 20 Hiarcs played and it stayed Qd2 - Do >you think that was a good move? > >>> >>>Uri -------- Mel, You couldn`t have possibly been playing the time control(40/2hrs)and come up with the move Rf1. It doesn`t sound like you are really playing a fair game with Hiarcs or like i said, it might be possible that somehow you have a corrupted file somewhere!!! ---- Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.