Author: Melvin S. Schwartz
Date: 19:34:57 07/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 1999 at 15:29:02, Terry Ripple wrote: >On July 24, 1999 at 14:00:11, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >> >>On July 24, 1999 at 12:40:32, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>On July 24, 1999 at 06:36:46, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>On July 24, 1999 at 06:21:39, blass uri wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>On July 24, 1999 at 04:43:06, Terry Ripple wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Hi Mel, >>>>>> I did exactly as you instructed and ran it from that Position on 40/2hr. and >>>>>>when Hiarcs7.32 made the move a4 (0.59/9), i then left Hiarcs continue to think >>>>>>on my time as if i was playing Hiarcs in a tournament setting and at no time did >>>>>>Hiarcs ever think it was in the "negative" and in fact Hiarcs kept a small >>>>>>plus(.46/10) for up to a "full 10 min." of its thinking on my time! I then >>>>>>repeated the same position before the move a4 and Hiarcs "STILL" wants to make >>>>>>the very "Same Move"- "a4". The position learning was working because before it >>>>>>showed in its analysis 2.a4, Nd7 3.a5, etc. but after i left it think on my time >>>>>>and tried the position once again it then was showing 2.a4, Nd7 3.Nf5,etc. >>>>>> This leads me to believe that if Mark and i are getting the same conclusions >>>>>>from our Hiarcs Program, that it dont take a "Rocket Scientist" to draw a >>>>>>conclusion that there must be something thats conflicting in your Hiarcs set-up! >>>>>> >>>>>>Regards, Terry >>>>> >>>>>I gave my hiarcs7.32 64 Mb hash tables and some hours on my pentium200 and at >>>>>depth 11/30 it wants to play >>>>>Rb1 instead of a4. >>>>> >>>>>I did not look at the screen so I do not know when Hiarcs changed its mind >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>>Now it wants to play Rf1 at the same depth with evaluation 0.31 after more than >>>>3 hours >>> >>>The game was played at 40/2. The question is not if hiarcs 7.32 will play Rf1, >>>the question is, is a4 played by Hiarcs 7.32 at 40/2 a blunder? This was the >>>claim. >>_______________ >> >>Now, Mark, you insisted Hiarcs only chose a4, so how come we now have Mr. Blass >>reporting that after 3 hours it wants to play Rf1? >> >>Mark, when I posted the examples for you, I used the words "bad move". Now, I >>gave you the reason why I said that because Hiarcs changed from a4 to Rf1. Very >>simple. Also, in this same game at move 20 Hiarcs played and it stayed Qd2 - Do >>you think that was a good move? >> >>>> >>>>Uri >-------- >Mel, > You couldn`t have possibly been playing the time control(40/2hrs)and come up >with the move Rf1. It doesn`t sound like you are really playing a fair game with >Hiarcs or like i said, it might be possible that somehow you have a corrupted >file somewhere!!! _____________ You are telling me I couldn't have been playing the game at 40/2. That is ridiculous! Totally absurd! Are you saying I am not aware of the time control I used? :))) _________________ >---- >Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.