Author: walter irvin
Date: 04:53:29 07/25/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 1999 at 01:20:34, Mark Young wrote: >On July 24, 1999 at 01:00:17, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >>You have not commented on the other gane where Hiarcs played h4 and had to >>settle for a draw when both Fritz and Rebel chose Nc5 with a clear advantage for >>White (Hiarcs). That h4 was a blunder! After h4 when I played a4 - the following >>sequence was posted for you - it resulted in a drawn position. Nc5 leads to a >>clear advantage for Hiarcs if it would have played that move. It is without any >>doubt a much better move than h4. > >Yes I did comment on it. > >Repost >__________________________________________ >7k/6p1/7p/pR6/1p2N3/6P1/2r4P/6K1 w - - 0 1 > >The move h4 play by hiarcs 7.32 is no blunder nor is it weak. It may be the best >move in the position. It is not White that is winning in this position, but >black. White best hope is for a draw, Nc5 can also hold the draw but it is not >as clear. You underestimate the power of two outside connect pass pawns >supported by a rook. > >__________________________________________ > > > >> >>By the way, Rebel 10 plays the following sequence after Nc5 better than Hiarcs. >> >>Give that game to Rebel 10 and you'll see it plays Nc5 and play that against >>Hiarcs at 40/2 - that is with Rebel playing White and Hiarcs playing black. Do >>not bother with Fritz because Fritz does not follow Nc5 with the correct line. lets face it when you got chess bozos trying to evaluate the play of a player rater 600 points higher confusion is bound to happen .i myself have watched gms play and seen positions where i felt they missed something . but even if they did, even if in some positions i play better than they do,does not mean i could beat them in a game .its lots of positions that is the tell of the tape , not a few isolated positions .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.