Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: I resign the Post as Moderator.

Author: Charles Unruh

Date: 13:16:27 07/25/99

Go up one level in this thread

On July 24, 1999 at 09:33:25, Amir Ban wrote:
>>>alone and must get the opinion of the third moderator.
>>>This was my understanding of the rules, and they were followed with no
>>>exceptions that I can remember.
>>>It doesn't seem the present moderators have worked out any such procedures, or
>>>at least that's my impression from the posts in this thread. If they were
>>>following the procedures set above, I would consider Bruce's action to be
>>>illegal, since he should have assumed that Fernando, by posting what he did,
>>>disagrees with him, and he had to resort to majority vote.
>>>I think Bruce showed very poor judgement here. His action would not deserve much
>>>comment against an ordinary member, and would probably be perfectly justified,
>>>but for the moderators to start censoring each other does not make sense, for
>>>reasons that have nothing to do with the charter. What we have now can be called
>>>a constitutional crisis.
>>>Experience shows that the post of moderator needs quite a bit of talent for
>>>politics and diplomacy. I hope the voters will remember this next time.
>>Your comments show a lack of insight and/or thought, and perhaps some
>>vindictiveness.  That is self-evident to the casual reader, so no argument is
>I don't even know from which angle you are attacking my opinion, so it can't be
>Why vindictiveness ? I think that part at least needs justification.
>>I am furthermore disappointed that, after so long an absence, you choose to post
>>on such an insubstantial matter.
>I don't consider this matter insubstantial.
>>  Really disappointing.
>I'm not thrilled to read your post either.

 You tell him who's boss Amir!!

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.