Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I vote to Boycott any program that won't let itself be published by SSDF

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 14:42:47 07/25/99

Go up one level in this thread


On July 25, 1999 at 04:03:17, Micheal Cummings wrote:

>On July 25, 1999 at 02:44:34, Tina Long wrote:
>
>>On July 24, 1999 at 18:26:35, Charles Unruh wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  I vote to Boycott any program that won't let itself be published by SSDF.  I'm
>>>tired of the true reason behind this. Which is best stated as "If I can't be #1
>>>don't put me on the list at all".  Play the best chess is all you have to do. CM
>>>isn't tuned against any program, doesn't have any special opening book, no
>>>learning features, and yet it sits practically atop Everest.  I don't even care
>>>if they went as far as to say well test the prog like CM manually instead of
>>>with an Autoplayer.  Don't sit around trying to tell people they can't publish a
>>>FREE non profit resource on the results of a program.  As for the SSDF they
>>>should never have let theirselves be bullied into listing secret programs in the
>>>first place.
>>
>>Rubbish,
>>I want a strong program.  More, I want the database & analysis features that I
>>want.
>>
>>CM sucks when it comes to analysis and database features.
>>
>>Charles, you boycott whatever you want to.  Don't buy Rebel in particular.
>>
>>I don't think the world cares.
>>
>>Hi guys,
>>It's hot & sunny in Australia,
>>
>>Tina Long
>
>Tine I am shocked, CM6K has maybe if not the best, one of the best analysis of
>any chess program. As for a database, I find it good enough. And if not then I
>would use rebel.
>
>This is an old story the pros and cons of chessmaster. You frequent this place
>only now and then and miss most posts regarding this matter. Simply put you are
>wrong about chessmaster. (CM6K) at least.
>
>And its cold and rainy in Sydney, Australia's best state and home of the 2000
>Olympics. But other than the bad weather today. Sydney is number one for
>bussiness and sport and just about everything else.

I don't think that the objection is so much that CM's analysis itself is bad,
just that if you have a pile of games and want to have them analyzed, other
software lets you get it done much more easily.

Dave




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.