Author: James Robertson
Date: 18:30:42 07/26/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 26, 1999 at 21:29:24, James Robertson wrote: >On July 26, 1999 at 21:23:52, odell hall wrote: > >>Hi CCC >> >> This is just my impression, I am not claiming to have any facts to back it up, >>perhaps someone could shed some information on this topic, It appears to me that >>computers are not doing to much better against humans now than they did on >>pentium 90 machines. It is clear that in computer vs computer games processor >>speed plays a very large role, against humans I don't think this is as true. For >>example Back in "84" pentium 90 genius 3 was beating supergrandmasters at >>game\30 on a regular basis, Now that we have pentium 500 the computers seem to >>be doing slightly better. Genius 3 on pentium 500 would no doubt slaughter >>Genius 3 on a pent 90, but against humans we may see only a 20-30 pt difference >>if that? I am nuts? opinions welcome. > >I think it is that humans have gotten much better aginst computers. :) > >James Just thought I would add, how many games did Genius 3 have to win before you considered it 'regular basis'? James :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.