Author: Tina Long
Date: 05:36:41 07/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 26, 1999 at 04:41:42, Tina Long wrote: >On July 25, 1999 at 04:03:17, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >>On July 25, 1999 at 02:44:34, Tina Long wrote: >> > >> >>Tine I am shocked, CM6K has maybe if not the best, one of the best analysis of >>any chess program. As for a database, I find it good enough. And if not then I >>would use rebel. > >Hi Micheal, >I was talking features rather than strength. >CM6k won't even give me a "next best", or variations while playing a game. >Look at the next bests in Rebel 10, look at "correspondance Analysis" in Fritz >GUI. Look at the "overnight analysis" ed is promising in 10.5. > >CM plays very strong tactical chess, but CM's GUI has hardly improved since >CM4000. > >I set my Hiarcs (Fritz GUI)overnight to examine all single moves from a >position, within 100% pawn, and one reply, at a depth of (say) 11ply, then spend >the rest of the night thinking deep to find what it thinks is best. Over >breakfast I've got heaps of info (even printable) to wade through. CM will not >provide this type of o'nite analysis. >> >>This is an old story the pros and cons of chessmaster. You frequent this place >>only now and then and miss most posts regarding this matter. > >You don't know!! I lurk here always, I post only now & then (as you see). > >> Simply put you are wrong about chessmaster. (CM6K) at least. > >In your opinion. > >> >>And its cold and rainy in Sydney, Australia's best state and home of the 2000 >>Olympics. But other than the bad weather today. Sydney is number one for >>bussiness and sport and just about everything else. > >Crime, traffic congestion, polution, > >It never rains at Mount Kembla!! > >Hi guys, >Tina Long No reply?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.