Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderation: Respond to Fernando

Author: Fernando Villegas

Date: 15:42:03 07/29/99

Go up one level in this thread


On July 29, 1999 at 05:37:19, Herman Hesse wrote:

>
>
>>Hi:
>>That's the very same reason why I think that to put so much stress over the
>>neccesity to erase "off topic" post seems to me a kind of missplaced arrogance.
>>Nothing here is so important and then everything is more or less equally
>>important or not important. Hash table, a joke, difference in importance is just
>>academical. Even so, considering the purpose of this place, I never posted a
>>joke before and rarely and off topic thing, but even a minute post made for
>>share a funny history with supposed friends seems too much for certain people.
>>Really I was amazed at the degree of flames something that in almost every
>>country is just nothing, a passing joke you forget at once,  could produce such
>>post againts me.
>
>Why are you flamed, Fernando? Was it you? Here is my 2 cents: They are competing
>to find the champion. They have subjectif and objectif methods. They have SSDF,
>World Championship, testing games, testing positions, many methods, also
>feelings, also reinforce the purchase decision, also friend of programmer, or
>programmer make propaganda for fame and glory. This is always argument because
>so many methods and no science. Can be no science.  Just great murky pool.
>
>For top ones it is always also so personal. Top ones are in their programs.
>Indistinguishable. This is problem for soul. For not so top ones is also
>problem. These have Cassius with "mean and hungry look". You know what I mean?
>When he turned on you, the young one?


I Know what you mean. What I did not know was Shakespeare with some interest in
chess computers :-)
>



>Result is argue about champion goes forever. So easy to make loser. Then
>suddenly all turn on loser. Especial all Cassius.
>
>>Beside, you expect some moderation in the way the erasing is
>>made if, anyway, they think they must erase.
>
>The moderate is eliminate. Where ends it? After all is gone?
>
>>But on the contrary, If from the
>>very first minute you are said that you have a dirty mind and have putted
>>something stupid and one hasrh and flaming word follow another because of
>>putting such things, worthy, as Bruce said,  of the wall of your bathroom, and
>>if, even more, when you resign and explain why they say you are performing a
>>trick, well, after all that you wonder why are you going to let that people with
>>the last word, sensing victoriuous and without opposition.
>
>When these have no opposition, one will rise from own ranks to be opposition.
>Until one left only. Ten green bottles standing on the wall.
>
>>Finally I have
>>learned a lot: the world is a place even more mad than i thought.
>
>Cannot make winner agreement, but can make loser agreement. Then all feel
>better. Only in mad world.
>
>>Greetings from the madhouse
>
>You are not mad. Certainly you are not mad.


Who knows... If they are sane, I am mad; if they are all mad and I am the sane
one, then I am not anymore he sane.
fernando



>Herman
>
>>Fernando
>>



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.