Author: Herman Hesse
Date: 02:56:50 07/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 1999 at 18:42:03, Fernando Villegas wrote: >On July 29, 1999 at 05:37:19, Herman Hesse wrote: > >> >> >>>Hi: >>>That's the very same reason why I think that to put so much stress over the >>>neccesity to erase "off topic" post seems to me a kind of missplaced arrogance. >>>Nothing here is so important and then everything is more or less equally >>>important or not important. Hash table, a joke, difference in importance is just >>>academical. Even so, considering the purpose of this place, I never posted a >>>joke before and rarely and off topic thing, but even a minute post made for >>>share a funny history with supposed friends seems too much for certain people. >>>Really I was amazed at the degree of flames something that in almost every >>>country is just nothing, a passing joke you forget at once, could produce such >>>post againts me. >> >>Why are you flamed, Fernando? Was it you? Here is my 2 cents: They are competing >>to find the champion. They have subjectif and objectif methods. They have SSDF, >>World Championship, testing games, testing positions, many methods, also >>feelings, also reinforce the purchase decision, also friend of programmer, or >>programmer make propaganda for fame and glory. This is always argument because >>so many methods and no science. Can be no science. Just great murky pool. >> >>For top ones it is always also so personal. Top ones are in their programs. >>Indistinguishable. This is problem for soul. For not so top ones is also >>problem. These have Cassius with "mean and hungry look". You know what I mean? >>When he turned on you, the young one? > > >I Know what you mean. What I did not know was Shakespeare with some interest in >chess computers :-) >> Shakespeare is off-topic. True? Multi-culture, multi-discipline is off-topic. True? Implication? Wisdom is off-topic. Implication? Only foolishness remains. And youth. Hence Cassius. > > > >>Result is argue about champion goes forever. So easy to make loser. Then >>suddenly all turn on loser. Especial all Cassius. >> >>>Beside, you expect some moderation in the way the erasing is >>>made if, anyway, they think they must erase. >> >>The moderate is eliminate. Where ends it? After all is gone? >> >>>But on the contrary, If from the >>>very first minute you are said that you have a dirty mind and have putted >>>something stupid and one hasrh and flaming word follow another because of >>>putting such things, worthy, as Bruce said, of the wall of your bathroom, and >>>if, even more, when you resign and explain why they say you are performing a >>>trick, well, after all that you wonder why are you going to let that people with >>>the last word, sensing victoriuous and without opposition. >> >>When these have no opposition, one will rise from own ranks to be opposition. >>Until one left only. Ten green bottles standing on the wall. >> >>>Finally I have >>>learned a lot: the world is a place even more mad than i thought. >> >>Cannot make winner agreement, but can make loser agreement. Then all feel >>better. Only in mad world. >> >>>Greetings from the madhouse >> >>You are not mad. Certainly you are not mad. > > >Who knows... If they are sane, I am mad; if they are all mad and I am the sane >one, then I am not anymore he sane. Censorious worlds always invert reason and madness. Truth and thought are cast out as madness. Only pre-defined thought patterns are allowed. Only a stultified sub-set remain. Herman >fernando > > > >>Herman >> >>>Fernando >>>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.