Author: Chris Taylor
Date: 12:27:36 07/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 30, 1999 at 14:05:01, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: > A few weeks ago somebody asked which selectivity levels were better for CM6000 >to analyze at very long time controls, suited for correspondence play. > The advice given was to use zero selectivity. I do not remember why I did not >answer at that time, but my advice is exactly the opposite: the longer the time >control the higher the selectiviyy level should be set, and not only for CM6000 >but for any program that allows you to change it. > The reason is that, due to the exponential nature of the search tree, the extra >time is almost worthless when using no selectivity or very low selectivity. >Jos This seems good advice, and falls in line with Hiarcs 7 and the setting of selectivity to the highest for Corres analysis. Unless you know different!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.