Author: leonid
Date: 18:07:38 08/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 01, 1999 at 21:02:54, Scott Gasch wrote: >Ouch... > >I only can search to 4 ply in that position in 60 sec and my null move succeeds >about 40% of the time. I believe this bad performance has sometime to do with >my qeval routine and the fact that it considers all captures/promotes. I think >I need to be more selective about captures in the qeval routine. My program >plays f2f3 after 1 minute of thought. Here's the report (if anyone cares): > > total nodes.....................................4588297 > time (sec)......................................60.71 > rate (nodes/sec)................................75579 > > null move successes.............................73 > null move failures..............................117 > null move success rate..........................38.42% > > pawn hash hits..................................4469147 > pawn hash misses................................117413 > pawn hash success rate..........................97.44% Your numbers are quite interesting for me, and the most the positions/second factor. This number says a lot even if it some time very evasive. This I could see by observing similer numbers on Rebel 10. Can you say on what computer you obtained your numbers and what you have exactly working inside of your program (like minimax, alpha-beta...). Leonid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.