Author: James Robertson
Date: 18:57:48 08/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 02, 1999 at 21:07:38, leonid wrote: >On August 01, 1999 at 21:02:54, Scott Gasch wrote: > >>Ouch... >> >>I only can search to 4 ply in that position in 60 sec and my null move succeeds >>about 40% of the time. I believe this bad performance has sometime to do with >>my qeval routine and the fact that it considers all captures/promotes. I think >>I need to be more selective about captures in the qeval routine. My program >>plays f2f3 after 1 minute of thought. Here's the report (if anyone cares): >> >> total nodes.....................................4588297 >> time (sec)......................................60.71 >> rate (nodes/sec)................................75579 NPS is not bad. How fast is your program? James >> >> null move successes.............................73 >> null move failures..............................117 >> null move success rate..........................38.42% >> >> pawn hash hits..................................4469147 >> pawn hash misses................................117413 >> pawn hash success rate..........................97.44% > >Your numbers are quite interesting for me, and the most the positions/second >factor. This number says a lot even if it some time very evasive. This >I could see by observing similer numbers on Rebel 10. Can you say on what >computer you obtained your numbers and what you have exactly working inside >of your program (like minimax, alpha-beta...). > >Leonid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.