Author: James Robertson
Date: 18:58:18 08/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 02, 1999 at 21:57:48, James Robertson wrote: >On August 02, 1999 at 21:07:38, leonid wrote: > >>On August 01, 1999 at 21:02:54, Scott Gasch wrote: >> >>>Ouch... >>> >>>I only can search to 4 ply in that position in 60 sec and my null move succeeds >>>about 40% of the time. I believe this bad performance has sometime to do with >>>my qeval routine and the fact that it considers all captures/promotes. I think >>>I need to be more selective about captures in the qeval routine. My program >>>plays f2f3 after 1 minute of thought. Here's the report (if anyone cares): >>> >>> total nodes.....................................4588297 >>> time (sec)......................................60.71 >>> rate (nodes/sec)................................75579 > >NPS is not bad. How fast is your program? Wasn't thinking, meant computer. James > >James > >>> >>> null move successes.............................73 >>> null move failures..............................117 >>> null move success rate..........................38.42% >>> >>> pawn hash hits..................................4469147 >>> pawn hash misses................................117413 >>> pawn hash success rate..........................97.44% >> >>Your numbers are quite interesting for me, and the most the positions/second >>factor. This number says a lot even if it some time very evasive. This >>I could see by observing similer numbers on Rebel 10. Can you say on what >>computer you obtained your numbers and what you have exactly working inside >>of your program (like minimax, alpha-beta...). >> >>Leonid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.