Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Really wierd idea: Pawn value as a function of position...

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 08:49:10 08/04/99

Go up one level in this thread


On August 04, 1999 at 02:43:44, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>
>On August 03, 1999 at 22:35:16, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>And, at the moment of queening, it is worth slightly *more* than a
>>queen.  The reason it is worth more than a queen is that it can become a queen,
>>or another piece -- if that is advantageous.  A queen cannot do that.  So, the
>>moment it lands on the promotion square it has a value of something just over
>>10.
>
>Immediate tactical considerations aside, given a choice between having a pawn
>and having a queen, I'll take the queen, no matter where the pawn is.
>
>Which would you rather have in KQ vs KP, the queen or the pawn on the 7th?
This pawn, worth 255 centipawns, is on the 7th rank (it has advanced 5 times):
ranks advanced = 5, value = 2.547
This pawn, worth 1035 centipawns, is on the 8th rank (it has advanced 6 times):
ranks advanced = 6, value = 10.347

Therefore, it is a queen (if you so choose).  However, I thought about it, and
my 10.347 bonus is a gross error.  That is because the +10 is already built in
once the piece turns into a queen (if chosen).

I did not make my nomenclature clear (obviously).



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.