Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: KQ vs kr position

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 15:13:32 08/05/99

Go up one level in this thread


On August 05, 1999 at 15:37:49, KarinsDad wrote:

>If I am in a mate in 150 position (I was previously in a mate in 200) and I find
>a mate in 170 that resets the counter, then I do not care if the mate in 170
>does not have another pawn push or capture in it. I am destined to draw in the
>mate in 150, so I take the chance. The worse that can happen to me in the mate
>in 170 position is that I draw due to the 50 move rule.

If you have played 20 of the 50 moves that are possible without resetting the
counter, and you find a move to reset the counter, should you take it?

Overall, perhaps the odds would be in favour of taking it, but there may (read
"will") be positions where this procedure only draws, while delaying an
opportunity to reset the counter until a later point (e.g. 40 of the 50 moves)
would eventually lead to a win.  The opposite situation is of course also
possible.

Frankly, the whole idea is much less practical than simply building DTC tables,
because the latter is really what you (read "KarinsDad") are looking for.

Dave



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.