Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 10:20:12 08/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 07, 1999 at 10:13:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On August 07, 1999 at 09:02:33, Randy Schmidt wrote: > >>Bob, >> >>I understand that chess analysis is mostly integer >>arithmetic. Would this mean that the Celeron proc >>is better? I refer to the L2 post earlier....where >>it appeared the Celeron was "fastest". >> >>THANKS! > > >The Celeron has looked very good in reports from others. I've said >several times that the best deal you can get is probably a dual celeron >machine... > CELERON is indeed a great processor. To my big surprise is a 450Mhz celeron nowadays 7.2% faster for DIEP. when running parallel version of DIEP, this one is still faster than the PII, but less than 5%. this is quite weird considering that about a year ago celeron was a lot slower for DIEP. At that time my datastructure was smaller as it was 8 bits mainly. Right now everything is 32 bits. For crafty celeron is about 10% faster. >cheap _and_ fast... indeed, hard to compete with for AMD!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.